<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Neglect-O-Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name</link>
	<description>Wherein I abuse blogging software</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 05:54:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Canadian Tire Options MasterCard Rewards Rate is not 1%</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/canadian-tire-options-mastercard-rewards-rate-is-not-1/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/canadian-tire-options-mastercard-rewards-rate-is-not-1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 21:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Canadian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[credit]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MasterCard]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Options]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[percent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[percentage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[points]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rewards]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tire]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael.lesauvage.name/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bottom Line Up Front: &#8211; Depending on the specifics of how you spend your rate can be much lower than the commonly stated 1% cash back (in Canadian Tire &#8216;money&#8217;).  In my case the rate is closer to 0.86%. The Details One of our credit cards was recently automatically replaced with a new variant.  On [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom Line Up Front: &#8211; Depending on the specifics of how you spend your rate can be much lower than the commonly stated 1% cash back (in Canadian Tire &#8216;money&#8217;).  In my case the rate is closer to 0.86%.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">The Details</span></p>
<p>One of our credit cards was recently automatically replaced with a new variant.  On looking at its reward level I decided I wanted to compare to my Canadian Tire Options MasterCard.  I recalled that the rate was 1%, but I wasn&#8217;t certain, so I opened up my most recent statement.  I was quite surprised when I did the math and found only 0.86%.  Given that we use only one credit card, and funnel most purchases through it, this is easily a $50/year difference in rewards.</p>
<p>When I first got the credit card, at least 10 years ago, I recall it being advertised at 1% (for purchases outside of Canadian Tire).  I can&#8217;t swear by it, but the 1% was sure stuck in my head.  Perhaps the rate had changed?  I went to <a title="Options MasterCard Ad" href="https://www.ctfs.com/Products/CreditCards/OptionsMasterCard/">the web site</a> to check and see the following:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Ad.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-62" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Options MasterCard Web Advertisment" src="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Ad.png" alt="Header page on CTFS site for the Canadian Tire Options MasterCard" width="367" height="347" /></a></p>
<p>Well that&#8217;s less than helpful.  Interestingly, the other credit cards on offer from the same (Gas Advantage, Cash Advantage) site detail their rewards pretty well.  But there <em>is</em> a footnote &#8211; surely that will clear it up?</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Footnote.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-59" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Options MasterCard Footnote" src="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Footnote.png" alt="The unhelpful footnote for the Canadian Tire Options Mastercard" width="895" height="37" /></a></p>
<p>OK, not so much.  Neither does the legal text, which only talks about the generalities of reward programs.  But the footnote had a link to the <a href="https://www.ctfs.com/Products/CreditCards/OptionsMasterCard/CTMoneyRewards/index.jsp">Canadian Tire &#8216;Money&#8217; Rewards Program Page</a>.  Sadly, this doesn&#8217;t help either, and only starts making me a little angry:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Rewards.png"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-60" style="border: 1px solid black;" title="Canadian Tire Rewards" src="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Options_Rewards.png" alt="The Canadian Tire Rewards Program - Unexplained" width="527" height="760" /></a></p>
<p>So, they reserve the right to change the program at <em>any</em> time, <em>without</em> a requirement of informing the program members, and even if someone wants to learn how they earn rewards, they have to call to determine their benefits.</p>
<p>I now pick up the phone and speak to a very nice and eager-to-help man.  At first he tells me the rate of cash back, in general, on non-Canadian Tire purchases, is 1%.  When I explain my issue to him, he further clarifies that sometimes the exact amount can differ, as purchases are rounded both up and down to the nearest dollar, so the exact amount of cash back will not be equal to 1%, but should be close.  When I tell him the large difference I&#8217;ve encountered, he digs deeper by examining my specific purchases and we find:</p>
<ul>
<li>Purchases are always rounded down, never up.</li>
<li>Purchases seem to be rounded down in different increments depending on amount of money being spent.</li>
</ul>
<p>For example, we looked at the following purchases and payback:</p>
<ul>
<li>$1.84 resulted in 1 cent reward (rounded down to $1)</li>
<li>$73.33 was rounded down to $70 for reward calculation.</li>
<li>$244.61 resulted in a $2 reward (rounded down to $200)</li>
<li>$278.25 resulted in a $2.5 reward (rounded down to $250)</li>
</ul>
<p>In general, it looked to me like:</p>
<ul>
<li>in the &lt;$10 range purchases were truncated to the nearest dollar</li>
<li>from $10 to &lt;$100 range purchases were truncated to the nearest ten dollars</li>
<li>greater than $100 purchases were truncated to the nearest $50</li>
</ul>
<p>I told him that I was pretty upset with this arrangement and that I would like someone from management to call me.  (I will just point out here that the guy helping me was great and spent a lot of time looking this info up with me).  I didn&#8217;t hear anything for a week, and just when I was getting ready to call back, a physical paper letter arrived in the mail (click either to enlarge).</p>
<p><a href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CTOM-Letter-Page-One.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-63" title="CTOM Letter Page One" src="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CTOM-Letter-Page-One-395x500.jpg" alt="Letter From Canadian Tire Options MasterCard (2)" width="395" height="500" /></a> <a href="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CTOP-Letter-Page-Two.jpg" target="_blank"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-64" title="CTOP Letter Page Two" src="http://michael.lesauvage.name/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/CTOP-Letter-Page-Two-387x500.jpg" alt="" width="387" height="500" /></a></p>
<p>The start of the letter explains how money is earned when shopping at Canadian Tire specifically (not really important in this comparison as I don&#8217;t spend enough money there to make a difference).  After telling me that the reward program on out-of-store purchases is &#8220;one of the most generous customer reward programs on the market&#8221; a set of examples follow.  While I&#8217;m not stating it the same way they do, in essence:</p>
<ul>
<li>$278.25 is rounded down to $250</li>
<li>$244.61 is rounded down to $200</li>
</ul>
<p>They then generically explain how purchases are handled:</p>
<ul>
<li>Outside merchant purchase &lt;$1 &#8212;- 1% rounded down to nearest 0.10</li>
<li>Outside merchant purchase &gt;$1 &#8212;- 1% rounded down to nearest 0.50</li>
<li>[The remaining 3 calculations are for Canadian Tire stores/services/fuel specifically]</li>
</ul>
<p>The calculations are generally what I saw but don&#8217;t explain the $73.33 purchase.  They&#8217;re obviously missing <em>something</em> because a purchase of $49 would, from the math and ranges they provided, be multiplied by 1% and rounded down to the nearest 0.50 &#8211; which would be zero.  So some sort of bracket is missing in their explanation and is likely a rounding down to the nearest 0.10 for purchases greater than $1 but less than $100.  (This is even more likely given that they have roundings of 0.10 for in-Canadian-Tire purchases).  If this is correct it is quite astounding &#8211; from the point of view of making small purchases in the $50 to $200 range,  the <em>more</em> you spend, the <em>less</em> of a reward you get, as a percentage, in general!  No <em>wonder</em> they don&#8217;t list the details online&#8230;</p>
<p>The last part of the letter is in regards to the benefits we receive for being &#8220;elite&#8221; members which increases our rewards by 20% but doesn&#8217;t affect the base rate &#8211; by which I mean, my base rewards would be exactly the same no matter if I was an elite member or not.  With the elite rewards added in, we earn close to the original 1%.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Bottom Line</span></p>
<p>Canadian Tire Options MasterCard is not the deal it used to purport to be, not the deal people think they are getting, and not even the deal its customer support people understand it to be.  I am now investigating other rewards programs (almost all of which obfuscate the rate of rewards in one way or another but at least they give you the details online) and will likely move to a card that doesn&#8217;t have such a blatant unnecessary and confusing formula as to how rewards are generated.  Come on Options MasterCard &#8211; if you only want to pay out at 0.86% then just <em>make that the rate</em>.  Stop taking advantage of the laziness of your consumers!</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><span style="color: #808080;">Update: Now including a link to a web search I had forgotten to include in this write up, seems to me to be shilling for the card, </span><a href="http://www.canadian-money-advisor.ca/threadview/2960.html">wherein the rate is given as 1% without any nuance</a><span style="color: #808080;">.  Number 5 on Google search results.  That is the only information I can find on the rate being paid out.</span></p>
<p><span style="color: #888888;">Update 2 (15 Dec 2011): this article has recently captured some attention; it&#8217;s nice to see there are some other folks out there willing to look at their monthly statement.  No, I haven&#8217;t switched cards yet &#8211; but only due to laziness.  I am keeping my eyes open for a new contender.</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/canadian-tire-options-mastercard-rewards-rate-is-not-1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>25</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IEEE Conference on Systems</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/ieee-conference-on-systems/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/ieee-conference-on-systems/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Apr 2011 19:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[engineering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IEEE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[systems]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michael.lesauvage.name/?p=49</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My lunchtime keynote speech in Montreal seems to have gone over quite well. I was honoured to be invited to speak, and found the experience humbling &#8211; there were so many incredibly smart people at that conference doing advanced research in many fields I had no idea existed! If you&#8217;re here looking to contact me, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My lunchtime keynote speech in Montreal seems to have gone over quite well.  I was honoured to be invited to speak, and found the experience humbling &#8211; there were so many incredibly smart people at that conference doing advanced research in many fields I had no idea existed!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re here looking to contact me, please use the About/Contact Mike link from the left and read my email address from the custom CAPTCHA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/ieee-conference-on-systems/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This joke only for computer geeks who know Top Gun</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/this-joke-only-for-computer-geeks-who-know-top-gun/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/this-joke-only-for-computer-geeks-who-know-top-gun/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2008 23:43:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael.lesauvage.name/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I work with a guy who, even though he is awesome in many ways, still loves Top Gun. We were talking about some computer bugs the other day and I came up with: &#8220;Your brain is writing code your computer can&#8217;t cache!&#8221; He didn&#8217;t want to laugh (it encourages me), but he did anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I work with a guy who, even though he is awesome in many ways, still loves Top Gun.  We were talking about some computer bugs the other day and I came up with:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Your brain is writing code your computer can&#8217;t cache!&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>He didn&#8217;t <em>want</em> to laugh (it encourages me), but he did anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/this-joke-only-for-computer-geeks-who-know-top-gun/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hey, Taxi</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/hey-taxi/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/hey-taxi/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 06:21:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael.lesauvage.name/?p=30</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pad 6 Please! My remake of Space Taxi, now itself a few years old, is finally back up on the web for your gaming pleasure. Just click on the link to your left to read the full story.  You&#8217;ll find a link there to download the game.  Enjoy!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pad 6 Please!</p>
<p>My remake of Space Taxi, now itself a few years old, is finally back up on the web for your gaming pleasure. Just click on the link to your left to read the full story.  You&#8217;ll find a link there to download the game.  Enjoy!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/hey-taxi/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8230; and Mrs. Finnegan Called for Lunch</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/and-mrs-finnegan-called-for-lunch/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/and-mrs-finnegan-called-for-lunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 14:56:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael.lesauvage.name/and-mrs-finnegan-called-for-lunch/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LUNCH! As a wedding gift for Sarah Kennedy, I converted a cassette tape of Gerry O&#8217;Kane live at the Wellington in Kingston into high-quality MP3s. Well, as high a quality as I can get given that the songs came from a decade-old tape and I have a run-of-the-mill player. You can find them all from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1>LUNCH!</h1>
<p>As a wedding gift for Sarah Kennedy, I converted a cassette tape of Gerry O&#8217;Kane live at the Wellington in Kingston into high-quality MP3s.  Well, as high a quality as I can get given that the songs came from a decade-old tape and I have a run-of-the-mill player.  You can find them all from the links on the left.  If you&#8217;ve got some fond Gerry memories, please post them over there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/and-mrs-finnegan-called-for-lunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Old nerd joke, revisited</title>
		<link>http://michael.lesauvage.name/old-nerd-joke-revisited/</link>
		<comments>http://michael.lesauvage.name/old-nerd-joke-revisited/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike LeSauvage</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.michael.lesauvage.name/old-nerd-joke-revisited/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Telling my brother yesterday about the new site, he came up with this: Q: What did Spock find at www.enterprise.com/toilet? A: The captain&#8217;s blog. Without knowing the original, this probably won&#8217;t seem nearly so funny.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Telling my brother yesterday about the new site, he came up with this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Q: What did Spock find at www.enterprise.com/toilet?</p>
<p>A: The captain&#8217;s blog.</p></blockquote>
<p>Without knowing the original, this probably won&#8217;t seem nearly so funny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michael.lesauvage.name/old-nerd-joke-revisited/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

